 |
 |
Archive for September, 2009
Posted by Albert
We’re not sure if the federal funding issue will come up, but the Foothill Extension will be the topic of the day tomorrow – as Metro Chairman Ara Najarian is set to give the keynote speech at tomorrow’s Gold Line workshop in Monrovia. From the press release, Ara is set to talk about how the Gold Line Foothill Extension fits into Metro’s overall regional plans.
However, the meeting’s main focus will be on the public-private partnership opportunities that will come with the construction of the Foothill Extension. Many engineering firms and their representatives will be at the workshop.

Workshop information:
What: Gold Line Foothill Extension Informational Workshop on Public-Private Partnerships
When: September 29, 2009 at 8:30 AM
Where: Doubletree Hotel, 924 W. Huntington Dr, Monrovia, CA 91016
For more information on the workshop, click on the image to the right for the full details.
September 28th, 2009 | No Comments
Posted by Albert

Get a nice good look at that image above. Take your time. Print it. Analyze it. Maybe even write notes on it – that big green blob over New York has plenty space to write on, but not Los Angeles. See anything awfully wrong and off with that image?
The Metro Board of Directors did, and yesterday they held their monthly Board meeting – with one of its main focuses on a new federal funding agreement Metro is hoping to pursue with the U.S. Department of Transportation. Metro’s current federal funding agreement netted the agency $491 million for the construction of the Gold Line Eastside Extension (NOT Foothill Extension, just to clarify). And with the last batch of federal dollars from that agreement coming in this year, Metro has had its sights set on pursuing funds from the New Starts program for the Subway to the Sea and Regional Connector.
At yesterday’s meeting, Metro staff reported that the county faces the prospect of losing out on hundreds of millions of dollars from the federal government, starting in 2011, if they do not pursue any local rail projects for the New Starts program (at this point, the Metro Board had not formally recognized the Subway and Regional Connector as their choices). The comments that followed from the Board and staff were no less grim. Chairman Ara Najarian stated, “we are terribly underfunded as a region.” Using the old use-visuals-for-greater-effect method, Metro staff presented a map (see image above) of the FY2010 projection for New Starts funding throughout the nation – which saw many other (and some less populous) cities having federal funds that dwarfed the amount for Los Angeles County. Metro staff jokingly referred to the New Starts program as the “New York” program, seeing as the east coast region is set to receive nearly half of all the federal funds from New Starts. And in facing this situation, the Board unanimously voted to direct Metro CEO Art Leahy to pursue a federal funding agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation to construct the Subway to the Sea and Regional Connector.
So now Chairman Najarian is going to send a few delegates to Washington to test the waters, and the county isn’t going to lose out on hundreds of millions of federal dollars right? This would’ve been an easy question to answer were it not for a small detail Metro staff had potentially used in error.
That error was brought to light at the meeting courtesy of a representative from Congresswoman Judy Chu’s office – who pointed out during public comment that Metro’s staff had given an unrealistic timeframe of 3 years to receive federal funding for the Subway and Regional Connector. In fact, it takes 7-10 years for rail projects from the beginning to receive federal money. Judy Chu’s office proposed Phase 2B (Azusa to Montclair) of the Foothill Extension as a project that is further ahead in the pipeline than the Subway or Regional Connector, and one that could receive federal funds in as soon as 5 years. Seeing as how the Foothill Extension has had much more Congressional work done on its behalf, this wouldn’t be surprising. Judy Chu’s office stated:
“We need a federal strategy that truly leverages the billions of dollars being raised by Measure R and gives the county the most bang for its buck. If the Gold Line Foothill and East Side extensions and Crenshaw Line are excluded from entering the federal process, myself and the rest of the local Congressional Delegation will very literally have our hands tied from helping meet our community’s transit needs.”
So our question before the meeting was: how is the Foothill Extension going to get its federal money? After the meeting, that question still stands. However, it was alluded to during the meeting that Metro would try to find other sources of federal money for the extension. We’ll see.
September 25th, 2009 | 25 Comments
Posted by Albert
After a two month hiatus, the Metro Board of Directors is set to host another monthly board meeting. If you recall from the last public meeting in July, this meeting was supposed to be the day the Metro Board voted on the Long Range Transportation Plan – along with their plan to pursue federal funding for certain preferred projects as well. But like Board member Richard Katz remarked in July, “MTA never fails to miss an opportunity to delay,” the opportunity has been delayed once again. The discussion and vote has moved to their October meeting. However, that’s not the source of our recent frustrations and questions.
A lot (kind of) has happened since the Board reintroduced and discussed federal funding at the July meeting. First, we found out that a lot of the federal stimulus dollars in California went to projects that didn’t exactly fit President Obama’s preferred criteria: ready to build, creates jobs, reduces congestion and pollution – criteria that the Gold Line Foothill Extension can meet. Second, in a good show of putting differences aside, the Subway to the Sea’s biggest supporters – including Mayor Villaraigosa and Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky – called for a unified effort to get as many rail projects (including the Foothill Extension) into a federal funding agreement with Washington.
Third and last, which as you will see deserves its own paragraph, Mobility 21 – a regional transit coalition of which Metro is a part of – recently held a conference to identify Southern California’s biggest transit needs. Out of that conference came the conclusion that only two transit projects should receive federal funding: the Subway to the Sea and the Regional Connector. By using Measure R’s tax revenue (the same revenue that millions of San Gabriel Valley residents contribute to when sales tax increased half a cent in July), the plan is for Metro to show the federal government that they have used enough local funds to warrant federal funding. Let’s try to talk rational for a second and see the problem with the outcome of the Mobility 21 conference – as explained by Azusa Councilmember Keith Hanks:
“It looks to us like the other projects are 10 years away from needing federal money.”
Source: Gold Line not a funding priority for regional transportation coalition
That should say it all.
We’ll be covering tomorrow’s Metro Board meeting on Twitter @iwillride, and hopefully we’ll get to see how the situation/issue turns out. The meeting takes place at the Metro building at 9:30 AM.
September 23rd, 2009 | No Comments
Posted by Albert
Instead of commemorating the recent launch of our Facebook fan page (and it’s safe to assume that if you’re reading this and you’re on Facebook, you’re either already a fan or will be one soon – all paths lead to you being a fan), it’s probably better to use today’s blog post to explain the various ways you can be the Foothill Extension’s biggest fan (minus yours truly).
Become a fan on Facebook (click image below)
Follow our tweets on Twitter @iwillride (click image below)

Watch us on YouTube (click image below)

Subscribe to our blog entries via your RSS reader (Google Reader, NewsGator, etc) or via e-mail

By combining the use of all these tools, you’ll be able to:
- Read and share our latest blog entries
- See pictures and videos of our latest efforts to get the Foothill Extension up and running to Azusa in 2013 and Montclair in 2017
- RSVP to our rallies and our meet-ups at Metro Board meetings
- Sound like an expert on all things Foothill Extension and impress people with your knowledge of trendy topics like congestion relief, transit-oriented development, pollution reduction, and clean transit alternatives
September 22nd, 2009 | 5 Comments
Posted by Albert
That seems to be the mantra for Los Angeles County when it comes to transportation.
We all know that Measure R was passed partly as a reactive (and somewhat proactive) effort to ease the everyday pain of being a commuter in Los Angeles. Of course, most major cities’ residents suffer the same fate every weekday to and from work as well – so why does our region deserve special attention? Because according to the results of an IBM survey – as reported in a recent article by Reuters, our commutes hurt THE MOST. In a survey of 4,446 commuters in the top 10 metropolitan cities in the country, Los Angeles took the title for giving its residents the most emotionally painful commutes. Ouch – reading that hurt, but it won’t hurt as much as getting back onto the 210. To calculate scores for the aptly-titled “commuter pain index,” IBM surveyors measured responses to time, traffic, congestion, stress, anger (lots here) and impact on work.
But the pain doesn’t stop there.
Facing a different kind of hurt are the cities that sit further east along the Foothill Extension corridor. In an article published a few weeks ago in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, several inland cities expressed their angst and displeasure at the extremely long wait before their transit-oriented development plans – centered around their respective Foothill Extension stations – can come to fruition. In the words of La Verne resident Richard Taskesen: “maybe we’ll be dead by then.”
According to the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, the City of Montclair officials are hoping to create their own downtown – complete with residential buildings, shopping centers and restaurants – with transit (read: Foothill Extension) at the heart of it. La Verne has reserved land for similar development around its station. Claremont has already made its transit-oriented plans come to life, but is waiting for the Foothill Extension to arrive to make the “transit” in “transit-oriented” work. Ontario, which will be the last city to see the Gold Line as part of the Ontario Airport extension, has already identified land to be used when the train does finally arrive.
Unfortunately, talking about these plans nearly a decade before they can even start construction (because there’s no other choice) just adds more points for anger to the San Gabriel Valley commuter pain index. The culprit? Politics. But you already knew that.
September 21st, 2009 | 1 Comment
Posted by Albert
Those words up there weren’t just thrown together in an attempt to create some mental association of jobs, family, and happy riders with the Gold Line Foothill Extension (even though most rational people would come up with those associations themselves). Actually, those words represent the hope of a Pomona resident in a letter to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune:
Letters to the editor: A happy rider
I am awaiting the completion of the Gold Line Foothill Extension to Montclair as it will help me find a job out of my geographic range.
As of July 2, I became unemployed and I if the Gold Line was up and running, it would extend my job search and I will ride it!
Also, my tweens can ride it to their grandparents’ home. The sooner it is completed, the sooner I will get a job and the kids can visit grandparents.
Let’s get it completed, and make everyone a happy rider! Do not delay any longer. Happy times await everyone!
D.L. Slinger
Pomona
Source: Letters to the editor: A happy rider
Happy times do await. Keep up the enthusiasm and optimism D.L. Slinger – and many others in the San Gabriel Valley.
September 3rd, 2009 | 1 Comment
|
|
|